Fresh Footstep To Firefight


Footstep

The ordinance has trigged a multi-­polar debate in Jammu and Kashmir because each party has its distinct take on the ephe­meral law. The government led by the Peoples Democratic Party sees it as a ‘compulsion’, its ruling partner—the BJP—finds it is ‘too harsh’, the police deem it ‘necessary’ and the separatists term it as ‘intimidation’.

Recently, the Jammu and Kashmir Public Property (Prevention of Damage) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017, made any destruction of property due to “direct action” punishable. The October 25 rule also invites penalty on anyone calling for abetment of such offence. The “direct action” means strikes or demonstrations instead of taking the route of negotiation. The ordinance makes anyone who announces such public forms of protests that result in damage to public and private property liable to punishment with imprisonment for one to three years. It can also result in a fine equivalent to the market value of the property destroyed. Read More…

You may also read!

US could lose in war with China or Russia, panel warns

The United States is facing a national security and military crisis and could lose in a war against Russia

Read More...

Is there anyone from IAF in court now, asks CJI on Rafale

The Supreme Court reserved verdict on Wednesday on PILs seeking a CBI probe into alleged financial and procedural irregularities

Read More...

ASEAN: Furthering India’s interests in Indo-Pacific

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is in Singapore this week to attend the East Asia Summit, ASEAN-India informal meet and

Read More...

Leave a reply:

Your email address will not be published.

Mobile Sliding Menu