Rigorous norms must for selecting generals


Merits as an overriding criterion is the current buzzword for the selection of top commanders in the armed forces. Consequently, supersession has become the norm rather than the exception, as is highlighted in the case of recent appointments of service chiefs and commanders-in-chief (Cs-in-C). Two of our current chiefs have benefited from this parameter and a similar format is being touted for the impending selection of the third one.

While wanting to steer clear of this developing controversy, it is baffling to see orchestrated media reports trumpeting the relative merits of the prospective candidates. Merit throws up attendant complexities and consequences, which need to be resolved. Hence, there is a crying need for institutionalising the process and even defining ‘merit’ as it has to be legally sustainable.

Seniority vs merit

For better comprehension, important and relevant characteristics of the unique eco-system need flagging. Forces have always respected seniority. Seniors use Sir to address juniors, in deference to commissioning seniority.  Read More

You may also read!

Pakistan reviving days of Kashmir militancy by pushing Afghan terrorists into India: Intel

A chapter from Kashmir’s bloody militancy days is likely to make a comeback, with intelligence reports suggesting that Pakistan

Read More...

How Beijing is thinking about regional and global security

Last month, China came out with its tenth white paper on defence, China’s National Defense in the New Era, laying

Read More...

Red Horns Division of Army organizes NoKs and Veterans’ Conclave in Kokrajhar

A NoKs and Veterans’ Conclave was conducted by the unit of the Red Horns Division of the army at

Read More...

Mobile Sliding Menu